feat: interactive /plan-design-review + CEO invokes designer + 100% coverage (v0.6.4)#149
Merged
feat: interactive /plan-design-review + CEO invokes designer + 100% coverage (v0.6.4)#149
Conversation
The "qa-" prefix was confusing — this is the live-site design audit with fix loop, not a QA-only report. Rename directory and update all references across docs, tests, scripts, and skill templates. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rewrite /plan-design-review from report-only grading to an interactive plan-fixer that rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what a 10 looks like, and edits the plan to get there. Parallel structure with /plan-ceo-review and /plan-eng-review — one issue = one AskUserQuestion. CEO review now detects UI scope and invokes the designer perspective when the plan has frontend/UX work, so you get design review automatically when it matters. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add design-consultation to command/snapshot flag validation. Add 4 skills to contributor mode validation (plan-design-review, design-review, design-consultation, document-release). Add 2 templates to hardcoded branch check. Register touchfile entries for 10 new LLM-judge tests and 1 new E2E test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add LLM-judge quality evals for all uncovered skills using a DRY runWorkflowJudge helper with section marker guards. Add real E2E test for gstack-upgrade using mock git remote (replaces test.todo). Add plan-edit assertion to plan-design-review E2E. 14/15 skills now at full coverage. setup-browser-cookies remains deferred (needs real browser). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
All commits should be single logical changes, split before pushing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
/plan-design-reviewrewritten from report-only grading to interactive plan-fixer — rates each design dimension 0-10, explains what a 10 looks like, edits the plan to get there. Parallel structure with/plan-ceo-reviewand/plan-eng-review./qa-design-review→/design-review(the "qa-" prefix was confusing).Test Coverage
Pre-Landing Review
No issues found. All changes are skill templates, test files, docs, and build scripts.
Design Review
No frontend files changed — design review skipped.
Test plan
grep -r 'qa-design-review'returns zero hits🤖 Generated with Claude Code